call_of_duty4.jpg is reporting that Call of Duty 4 was the best selling title of 2007, with an impressive seven million plus copies sold since its November release. Those are certainly impressive numbers for what many considered a gamble on a new series direction. Still, for the gaming community, it’s both good and bad news.

First, the bad news-a game has been crowned the best selling game of the year. Not that’s anything wrong with the series particularly, but it hasn’t exactly been a series of restrain over the past few years. 1, 2, 3, 4, Big Red One, etc. have all clouded the market in recent years. It’s become the shooting equivalent of Madden Football. The games also promise inconsistent quality. While CoD 1, 2, and 4 are generally considered to be of exceptional quality, the other titles have been more suspect (though not nearly as bad as their Medal of Honor brethren).

So, what’s the good news? That a game not set in World War II was the best selling game of the year. The series, and first person shooters in general, needed a breath of fresh air from the tired World War II setting. 4, while still possessing many CoD characteristics, was a breath of fresh air for the series and the genre. It was also nice to see that fans rewarded for this gamble, as opposed to some other game series that have tried to offer something new. What does this mean in the long term? That we’ll likely see a 7. In the short term? 5.


Related posts:

  1. Guitar Hero to become Rock Band clone, and Call of Duty goes MMO
  2. Call of Duty 4 gets Game of the Year edition for April
  3. NPD sales data for month of January
  4. Dream On? No, Guitar Hero: Aerosmith is offficially announced
  5. Top ten games of 2007