Microsoft claims sales doubled since price drop Video of the day: Sonic cereal commercial Criterion Collection uses PS3 as reference Blu-ray player Game design workshop: Cheer Squad Prince of Persia film first look
Prince of Persia film first look Actor Bernie Mac dead at 50 Friday the 13th (2009) premiere trailer Resident Evil CG movie trailer premiere The Omen unleashes Hell on Blu-ray
Five tattoos that are turn-offs Video games can be dangerous for your relationships Five signs for men that your date is a jerk Five signs for women that your date is a jerk Navigating different religions in dating
Wikipedia is not plagiarism Celestine Apprentice Pizza Pizza New site design My Essay
McCain campaign accuses Times? Dark Knight piece of media bias Kucinich introduces bill to impeach Bin Laden God says Clinton?s unwillingness to admit defeat echoes Satan God calls on Obama supporters to heal intellectual delusion God unsure what to think of McCain’s little basketball gambling ring
Re: Super Smash Bros. Brawl Friend Code Exchange Re: Super Smash Bros. Brawl Friend Code Exchange Re: Super Smash Bros. Brawl Friend Code Exchange Re: Super Smash Bros. Brawl Friend Code Exchange Re: Super Smash Bros. Brawl Friend Code Exchange
Jan
30th

A tax on games should include a tax on Doritos

Files under News | Posted by Justin |

doritos.gifNew Mexico is considering a tax on video games and televisions. The proposed one-percent sales would go toward funding outdoor educational programs for kids. When one considers that a one-percent even on a $3,000 top-of-the-line HDTV would be only $30, it doesn’t sound too bad. However, it misses a bigger issue.

Such an electronics is pure and simple social engineering. Depending on your personal beliefs you may find differing levels of social engineering acceptable, and that’s fine. The bigger issue is that it’s fairly selective social engineering. The idea is sponsored by The Environmental Alliance of New Mexico as a means of getting kids out into the environment and learning about it. So there is a very clear environmental bias to the issue, but what about kids’ ?

If you’re going to games to get people outside, then why not Doritos and other junk food to get people to eat healthier? The number of smokers has declined dramatically over the years as better education, higher taxes, and more restrictions have basically choked out many from the habit. If obesity is a major issue among the young, then shouldn’t it be treated through better education, taxes on both video games and junk food, and tougher regulations? Again, that’s up to your personal beliefs.

The fundamental flaw with this initiative is that it’s self-serving towards the environmental groups instead of those who it will actually affect. Such a small would do little to change lifestyles, and instead could come off as a money grab. If you’re going to try something like this you might as well go all or nothing and fight childhood obesity and general kids being lazy at all of their root causes. So the video games, but the Doritos, cable modem, and everything else while you’re at it. That is, if you’re interested in playing in the big issue.


Related posts:

  1. Why video games are the big fat wizard behind the curtain
  2. British bid to crackdown on violent films and games fails
  3. Video games may actually stall weight gain
  4. University of Buffalo study draws link between games and being fat
  5. Another newspaper on the side of games being useful in education

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Leave a Reply