Video of the day: Sonic cereal commercial Criterion Collection uses PS3 as reference Blu-ray player Game design workshop: Cheer Squad Prince of Persia film first look Working Donkey Kong game made of Legos
Prince of Persia film first look Actor Bernie Mac dead at 50 Friday the 13th (2009) premiere trailer Resident Evil CG movie trailer premiere The Omen unleashes Hell on Blu-ray
Five tattoos that are turn-offs Video games can be dangerous for your relationships Five signs for men that your date is a jerk Five signs for women that your date is a jerk Navigating different religions in dating
Wikipedia is not plagiarism Celestine Apprentice Pizza Pizza New site design My Essay
McCain campaign accuses Times? Dark Knight piece of media bias Kucinich introduces bill to impeach Bin Laden God says Clinton?s unwillingness to admit defeat echoes Satan God calls on Obama supporters to heal intellectual delusion God unsure what to think of McCain’s little basketball gambling ring
Re: Super Smash Bros. Brawl Friend Code Exchange Re: Super Smash Bros. Brawl Friend Code Exchange Re: Super Smash Bros. Brawl Friend Code Exchange Re: What was the most influential SNES game? Re: Super Smash Bros. Brawl Friend Code Exchange
Feb
2nd

Skate proves Electronic Arts isn’t all bad

Files under News | Posted by Justin |

ea_games.jpg announced in a recent earnings report that Skate outsold Tony Hawk Proving Ground by a nearly two to one margin. That news is both shocking and expected. Shocking in that the juggernaut was upturned. Expected in that innovation beat out a tired franchise.

Make no mistake, the franchise has been one of the crown jewels of gaming for years. However, just as with any series that gets turned over once per year, the innovation long ago left the series and has seen marginal improvements at best. In many ways it has mimicked the Madden Football franchise that many berate for. But wait, how does it make sense that such a stalwart as are the ones behind the innovative franchise?

Simple, they can afford to make a mistake. For every Madden and Harry Potter franchise, has moved more and more into original gaming. Yes, Madden is a disappointment as it rarely changes and buying out the NFL exclusivity contract certainly didn’t help EA’s reputation as an innovator. But look beyond that and you will see a company that often takes chances in ways that other companies cannot.

There are two types of companies that innovate-those that have nothing to lose, and those that have everything to lose and therefore one loss isn’t so bad. Take Nintendo for example. After the disappointment of the GameCube, Nintendo went back to the drawing board for the . They knew that both Sony and Microsoft had them beat unless they threw caution to the wind and really tried something new. Like it or hate it, the was the outcome of Nintendo being in that perspective. , on the other hand, has little to nothing to lose from a bomb here or there. Their sports franchises and movie tie-ins bring in enough money on their own to support failed original intellectual properties.

It’s cliché, trite, and perhaps even long in the tooth to bash EA for not being more innovative. However, it misses the point. While such a large company is often bad for competition, it is also often good for risk taking. It’s an unholy alliance that gamers simply have to accept.


Related posts:

  1. Activision says Tony Hawk to innovate to counter Skate
  2. EA Sports has eight titles headed for Wii

Post a Comment